留学加拿大托福考试独立写作范文分享
留学加拿大托福考试独立写作范文分享
Does modern technology help students learn more information and learn it more quickly?
Marvelous as it looks at first sight,modern technology does not help students learn information at a greater speed and with higher efficiency in most cases;or it could even work towards the opposite direction which led students to lose their initiative to learn and explore.
First of all,one property of modern technology is latently harmful to any learning mind—it distracts.One thing we feel about when we are searching for information online is that the internet,as an outstanding example of modern technology and even regarded as the innovator of education,provides us with not only relevant results to make use of,but also external links to click.More than once,I turned on my computer to check school library for resources,but ended up watching Youtube videos.In this case,computer as a representative of modern technology plays a negative role in learning information.We do acquire more information with the convenient tool,yet most of them are irrelevant and in the end procrastinating拖延would lower our learning.
Also,students would easily become disoriented in the huge sea of information.Although modern technology could equip us with easy access to information,the huge amount of resources would actually leave us discombobulated极其困惑的.Therefore,it is only we possess information more quickly rather than we learn it more quickly.An illustrating example is my experience with a HK digital library which stores almost all the books I desire.At first I enjoyed downloading them from the database.However,one month later I ended up with hundreds of books stored in my hardware,yet none of them finished or ever clicked. 托福独立写作
Furthermore,modern technology gives students an illusion that information and real knowledge is easy to learn–just by clicking mouse or watching videos.But in fact this forms only the first step towards useful information and effective learning,as learning of any kind requires full concentration and interactive thinking,which are almost absent in the process of popular e-learning experience.
To summarize,modern technology does not help students learn more information and learn it more quickly,though it does make access to information and resources much more easily.The popular e-learning still lacks the concentration,depth,and interaction that are the hallmark of traditional ways of educating and learning.
我们生活的时代比父辈们年轻时生活的时代更好还是更坏?
It seems that people always have a desire to compare:am I prettier than others?Are we living in a better age?Or,as the question goes,is our life easier and more enjoyable than it was several decades ago?I would say no,as I have witnessed the struggle and paradox悖论of our generation.
First of all,we are now living in an age of revolution with no previous human experience that could be referred to.Livingin such a fast-changing world would not be easy and comfortable at all;with everything keeps changing,everyone has to move fast in order to catch up with the majority.However,people were much more stable and care-free when our grandparents were children;they did not have to learn a second language in order to get a better job,or read a lot in order to get informed.Yet in our age,these are supposed to be the responsibility of young people.
Another discomfort of our age is that we are experiencing interpersonal alienation人际关系疏远.With the development of communication technology,people in fact become alienated with friends and relatives since they could be so easily accessed via phone or email.Too often we feel that few of our friends are true friends,without the traditional feeling of mutual affection which could only be created by long-time apart.But several decades ago,people treasured their friends and maintained relatively close interpersonal relations,which is much more enjoyable than the estrangements we are experiencing.
The last factor that has made our age so uncomfortable is the abusive use of technology.Although it brings much convenience,it essentially changes human–we are no longer the master of tools,but instead the slaves of devices.We rush to metro station in order to catch an early train,sit in front of radioactive computers all day long in order to get our work done,and stay in air-conditioned rooms all summer without experiencing the natural changes outside thick cement walls.Several decades ago,people could still live closer to nature and make rational use of modern technology,which to me is the essence of human living experience.
However,the comparison between different times is itself ridiculous.The criteria could not be easily determined,and opinions are highly personal.Anyway,we have a longer life span,more advanced medical facilities,and easier traffic than our grandparent when they were children,and we should treasure the present experience.Imagination of the past might only be nostalgia思乡–if I ask my grandparents the same question,they might as well say that our life is much better than the past generations.Who knows?As long as the world is still peaceful,life at any time would not become too difficult to handle.
Most advertisements make products much better than they really are.
I strongly agree to the statement that most advertisements makes the products presented much better than they really are,and points below supports my idea.
An essential reason concerns the nature of advertising–advertisers,in most cases,would only make products seem better than they really are,not the other way around.Since the ultimate aim of advertising is to persuade people into buying something,and people would naturally be attracted by something that is desirable rather than repellent,advertisements are certainly made to display a more attractive image of products.Therefore,customers would first be gravitated towards the virtual product that is somewhat dishonestly pictured by advertisers,then desire to own it,and eventually purchase it.In this way,the desire of consumers is satisfied,the purpose of production achieved,and the advertising process completed. 托福考试
But the norm that a“good”product is advertised as a“better”one is often challenged or even reversed–that is,unscrupulous businessmen make use of advertising to sell inferior products,which raises a moral question.For example,my mother was once attracted by a commercial of an encyclopedia which was claimed to be the one and only complete version of several ancient Chinese documents.She rushed to the shop and bought this“limited version”at a eye-popping price,and regarded it as one of the most precious things in our house.However,a few months later she found the same version was sold in bulk at another shop at an unbelievably low price,which annoyed her for quite a long time.We can learn from the experience that we should not always trust the advertisements that are apparently exaggerating products,and keep alert in the swarm of television commercials.
However,the notion that“advertisement always make us disappointed”sometimes results from consumers’unrealistic expectation of products.Advertising easily makes people to imagine“perfect”products which are not realistic at all,but consumers would rather keep this unreasonable hope.Then they would be inevitably disappointed by the actual products which cannot be so perfect,and attribute the cause to advertising.But it is actually the unrealistic expectation that eclipses any product,because a perfect image is absolutely subjective and could not even be realized.For example,I once signed up for a group tour to Lantao Island in HongKong,being attracted by the beautiful landscape pictures posted in the advertisements.But later on in the journey I was disappointed because actual scenery was never as attractive as what I had expected to see.Therefore,an unrealistic expectation is to be avoided in making any buying decision.
In conclusion,advertisements do make products seem much better than they really are,as are sult of commercial propaganda and our unrealistic hope imposed on products.A better solution would be that both consumers and sellers keep a more realistic point of view,and avoid unreasonable selling or buying behavior.
Does technology make children less creative than in the past?
Are our kids becoming lazier and less creative,less imaginable than before,as a consequence of highly advanced technology?My answer is no,and just the opposite,technology has apparently assisted our kids to become more creative. 托福写作
First and foremost,technology has provided children with easy access to scientific and liberal art resources which is their bestsource of inspiration.For example,children could now easily gain access to academic databases through iPad screen,read classical works on Kindle,or watch historic documents on Internet.These great works are essentially helpful to arousing their curiosity and prepares them with key knowledge necessary for any creation.However,these wonderful equipments and facilities are never as handy in the past,when kids could only reach limited resources in public libraries or schools.In this sense,technology has provided the possibility for children to be more creative.
Second,technology has equipped children with professional apparatus which could finally realize their imagination.This takes form particularly as computer softwares and applications,such as Photoshop for creative graphic design,Overture for easily composing a piece of music,3DMax for building up a virtual world,etc.All the software were never as handy as they are at present,and this would absolutely provides our children an effective tool for realizing their creativity.
Third,technology itself is a market place where creative ideas are economically encouraged.Steve Jobs earned millions of dollars a year for his unparalleled creation,and Mark Zuckberg gained his reputation for the genius social network.Therefore,technology has provided children the internal motive to develop their creativity.举例均是现实的，知识储备丰富
However,it is undeniable that technology might make children become lazier and be comfortable with what is already available because everything are so convenient nowadays and there seems to be no way to improve them.Children lost in PC games or blindly pursuing every single piece of tech apparatus is a relevant example.Thus,it is always necessary to keep children’s mind active in the marvelous world of technology.
In a nutshell,I still regard children as becoming increasingly creative in technology development,although it might bring minor side effect.As along as we keep a balanced mood on children enjoying the fruit of technology,they are sure to contribute more to innovation than in the past.
The teachers should be paid according to how well the students perform.
Teachers should in part be responsible of the students’school performance,yet I disagree to the statement that the teachers should be paid according to the students’performance on several grounds. 学在加拿大
The statement itself underlies a serious mistake–the very purpose of teaching and schooling,and education on a bigger scale,is better performance of all students.Common sense informs me that education,and teachers’responsibility in particular,should be intended to building up students’confidence in exploring and discovering unknown respects as well as specific skills required to accomplish that.Such standard is often broad and abstract in contrast to the narrowness and rigidity of the criterion–students’performance.If teachers’salary is determined by the students’performance,this hint would destroy the long-term function of schooling and education since the system is short-sightedly targeted at improving students’performance.
Another thing to be worried about the statement is that,if actually carried out,both teachers and students would be cast into the irrational pursuit for performance,and thus results in serious problems.For example,a teacher evaluated in this way is immediately forced to make the decision:to push her class toward the best performance or at least better than the worst-performing class,and show preference to students who perform well.Such measures might be incentives for a better grade,but the teacher and the students would lose their original motivation in schooling as performance becomes the one and only purpose.Also,consequent competition among students would place heavy pressure on every student,and the ones who do not perform well would be neglected by the teacher and fall into upset.Considering all the disastrous effect such measure could incur,it is obvious that teachers should not be paid on the basis of students’performance.
A more realistic and rational criterion to value teachers’work(and therefore decide their salary)should include factors such as comprehensive developments of students,teachers’own capacity to cultivate and educate,and parents’feedback.Yet my disagreement does not suggest that students’performance should be abandoned but rather included along with other indispensable factors in evaluating teachers’work,since school report is still among most parents’top concerns and students have to use it as an anchor when applying for further studies.Also,it is reasonable that teachers who can enhance students’performance should be paid better,as the measure would moderately motivate teachers to work hard.
In a nutshell,I object to the idea that the teachers should be paid on the basis of the students’performance,but should instead be evaluated on a medley of comprehensive quatatives which agrees with the purpose of education and schooling as well as encourages their effort toward more satisfying learning experience.
