留学加拿大语言考试如果用ChatGPT写雅思作文能拿到5分么

留学加拿大语言考如果用ChatGPT写雅思作文能拿到5分么

加拿大留学雅思写作部分很难得到高分，很多时候都会因为时间不够写不完，要是能提前背完合适的模板范文就好啦，考试的时候套进去！

但是！！使用模板范文需要谨慎，因为直接使用模板化的内容，很容易得到5.5分作文！

模板范文导致低分的原因

高重复率

具体来说，你能找到并且背诵的模板范文，大家也能找到，这就导致阅卷老师看见的文章雷同率很高，自然给不了高分。

使用不当

如果自己的水平和范文水平参差不齐，就更加容易被发现套用模板。雅思写作

比如，如果你看中了范文中的开头段或者结尾段，然后把其中和话题相关的表达扣掉，替换成和自己的题目有关的表达。

这个时候就容易出现一种现象：优质范文所用的词汇和句型都是高级的，而我们自己填充的部分就只能使用普通甚至简单的语言，范文与自己水平相差很远，那考官一眼就能判别出哪些是你写的、哪些是你背诵的。

雅思模板范文要不要背

范文的意义是在于备考初期，为了让你在完全搞不清楚状况时找到方向。

雅思范文要不要背呢？

当然要！但不是成篇大段地去背诵写好的文章。

大家可以把范文当成了解写作段落布局和层次的工具，将它灵活合理地套用到“不同题型、不同话题以及不同角度”的文章中，再加入自己的“想法”，言之有理。

雅思模板范文到底该怎么背？

有选择地使用范文句子

如果使用了大量的范文固定化短语和非直接的信息会让写作的流畅性受到影响。

比如这句话：

Every coin has two sides,and now I will examine the complex issues around…On the one hand,On the other hand...In addition...Thus…

凡事都有两面，那么现在我将阐述……的复杂问题，一方面看来，在另一方面看来……，另外，因此……

这里的套句和词汇占用了25个单词（占了整个篇幅的10%左右），但不是每个连接词或者句子都有实际的含义，全部放进文章中不仅让自己的观点看上去不明确，表达也不够清晰流畅。所以模板里的内容需要有选择地使用。

学习模板范文逻辑

其实范文最值得学习的，首先就是它缜密的逻辑了！因为在雅思写作中，当考生逻辑顺、框架清晰，考官会更能全面去评判文章。

逻辑是考鸭们写作比较薄弱的部分，大家可以在范文中加入更多自己的想法，然后详实论证，做到citical thinking，提出真正能够证明你观点的例子和反驳的论据，加强逻辑思维的训练，逐步提升自己的写作技能。

留学加拿大语言考如果用ChatGPT写雅思作文能拿到5分么

那么如果用ChatGPT写雅思比范文效果会更高分么ChatGPT会写作文、代码等，只要你提出具体的问题，ChatGPT就会基于现有数据库筛选出你需要的答案。而且回复速度很快，几秒钟就可以得出答案！

有网友用ChatGPT生成了《老友记》二十年后重聚剧本，情节流畅自然。其实学生是最早开始使用这一工具的群体之一。

ChatGPT代写作业已经成为美国大学的一种现象，调查显示现在美国89%的大学生都是用ChatGPT做作业，学生们已经在用ChatGPT肆无忌惮地作弊了，目前纽约的教育系统全面封杀了ChatGPT。

这个现象其实表明，ChatGPT在一定程度上可以从事学术研究和写作了。

既然软件功能很强大，那是不是可以应用在雅思写作中呀。

一起来看看在软件上如果问到有关大作文的话题，会得到什么回复呢？

Task 2题目

Some people think they have right to use as much fresh water as they want,while others believe government should control the use of fresh water as it is limited resource.Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

ChatGPT的回答如下：

Fresh water is a limited and precious resource that is essential for all life on earth.Some people believe that they have the right to use as much fresh water as they want,while others believe that the government should control the use of fresh water to ensure its responsible use and conservation.Both views have their own merits,and it is important to understand both sides in order to make an informed decision on this issue.

Those who believe that they have the right to use as much fresh water as they want argue that the water is a natural resource and is therefore the property of everyone.They believe that the government should not interfere with their use of this resource,as it is their right to do so.They also argue that water should be freely available to everyone,regardless of their income or status,and that the government should not impose restrictions on its use.This view is often motivated by a belief in individual freedom and personal autonomy,and is based on the idea that each person should have the right to make their own choices about how they use fresh water.

On the other hand,those who believe that the government should control the use of fresh water argue that this precious resource is becoming increasingly scarce and that it is essential to ensure its responsible use and conservation.They believe that the government should set limits on the amount of water that each person can use,and should regulate the quality of the water to ensure that it is safe for human consumption.This view is often motivated by concerns about environmental sustainability and the need to protect future generations from the impacts of over-consumption of water.

In my opinion,both views have some valid points.It is important to recognize that fresh water is a limited and precious resource,and that it is essential to conserve it for future generations.However,it is also important to recognize that people have a right to make their own choices about how they use this resource,and that the government should not interfere with this unless it is necessary to ensure the responsible use and conservation of the water.In my view,the government should set reasonable limits on the amount of water that each person can use,while also promoting conservation and the responsible use of water.This can be achieved through education,incentives,and the implementation of effective water management policies.

In conclusion,the debate over the right to use fresh water as one wishes versus government control of its use is a complex and multi-faceted issue.Both sides have valid arguments,and it is important to strike a balance between individual rights and the responsible use and conservation of this precious resource.Ultimately,the goal should be to ensure that everyone has access to safe,clean water for present and future generations.

其实ChatGPT可以在你陷入写作瓶颈时，为你提供写作思路，但是ChatGPT提供的内容还是需要大家认真辨别的呀，毕竟写作具有一定的主观性，其中的看法和观点因人而异。